Chapter 9 · Electrons in Atoms and the Periodic Table

9.1Blimps, Balloons, and Models of the Atom

7 min · two checks

Predict

Why did a planetary model of the electron fail, even though it looked like a solar system?

The idea

  • Explain why models of the atom changed.
  • Separate a useful picture from a literal one.

Chemists keep a model when it predicts and retire it when it cannot. Dalton’s indestructible atom explained mass laws and could not explain ions or spectra. The nuclear atom explained the gold-foil experiment and said nothing about why electrons do not fall inward. Bohr’s orbits explained hydrogen’s colors and failed for larger atoms. The quantum-mechanical model — orbitals as regions of probability — is the one this chapter uses because it organizes the periodic table.

You will still draw Bohr-like pictures sometimes, the way a map draws a city as a dot. The drawing is a tool. The claim of this chapter is narrower and stronger: electron arrangement, not atomic mass, is what makes the columns of the table behave alike.

Keep these

  • Models are judged by what they predict.
  • Classical orbits cannot explain stable atoms or multi-electron spectra.
  • The periodic table is an electron-structure table.

Check yourself

1. Bohr’s model is still mentioned because
2. The main reason to replace the “electrons orbit like planets” picture is that